Book Review : The Stranger
I.
Title:
Title:
Author: ALBERT
CAMUS’ first novel is this brilliantly crafted story and an illustration of
Camus’ absurdist world view, “the stranger”. In which was published in the
year, 1942. Its theme and outlook are often cited as examples of existentialism,
the absurdist rational/natural basis.
II.
Settings:
Time: Slightly around before WORLD WAR II happened
Place: Algeria (North Africa) 1940s, the region had
been a French country for a century , there is Arab discrimination by the
French that was manifested throughout the book.
III.
Characters
a.
Central
1.
Meursault – the protagonist and narrator of
the story
2.
Raymond Sintes – a catalyst of the book. He
abused his mistress and had conflict with her brother.
3.
Maria Cardona – the lover of Meursault
b.
Minor
1.
Meursault’s Mother – was dead at the very
beginning of the book.
2.
The Chaplain – the priest that attends the
religious needs of the men. He is the protagonist, Meursault’s’ philosophy and
psychological development mentor.
3.
Thomas Perez – an old resident of where the
main character lived
4.
Examining Magistrate – the person that
investigated Meursault’s crime
5.
The caretaker – who took care of Meursault’s
mom
6.
The Director – manager of “old persons home”
7.
Celeste – popetor of a café
8.
Masson – helped in Meursault’s trial and been
in the witness stand
9.
The Arab – the brother of the mistress
10.
Salamano – a catalyst example in the story
11.
The presecutor – lawyer of Meursault
c.
Dynamic
1.
Meursault – have disbeliefs and have troubles
with his beliefs especially towards the people around him.
d.
Static
1.
Maria Cardona – She is the faithful to the end
towards Meursault, even though he was imprisoned.
2.
Chaplain – a priest that was eager to make
Meursault believe in Christ, but he eventually failed to do so.
3.
Meursault – He still believes that the world
is nonsense and should be and is worthless because you’re going to still die in
the end.
e.
Round
1.
Meursault – He is conflicted with himself and
with his beliefs
f.
Flat
1.
The caretaker – she remained a talkative
character and is.
2.
The director – “the manager” that is
approachable about the people who stays in his building.
g.
Stock
1.
The caretaker - “the caretaker”, emphasizing
her occupation, rather than her nurse name
2.
Maria Cardona – “the faithful lover” because
as it was shown she was very loyal to Meursault.
3.
The Arab – “The Arab” because of disgrace
influence by the France of the Arabs, emphasizing his race and not his name
h.
Protagonist
1.
Meursault – because he is the narrator and the
story is about him
i.
Antagonist
1.
EVERYONE – because every character tried to
change him for who he was/is.
j.
Anti-Hero
1.
Meursault – because he was full of misery and
disbelief
k.
Foil
1.
Chaplain – contradicted his beliefs
2.
Persecutor – because he thought his client is
crazy with his beliefs about the world
l.
Symbolic
1.
Meursault – humanity’s problem in living
2.
Maria Cardona – people who are faithful too
much that they’re already hurting themselves.
IV.
PLOT
a.
Exposition –
Meursault visits his dead mother in the “old persons house”. During the trip
towards the place, he was asleep all throughout. During the funeral both the
caretaker and the director talked to Meursault, about his mom. Not a single
tear dropped from his face, though. Thomas Perez tried to catch up in the
funeral of his dear deceased friend, but he was dehydrated in the heat,
fainted, I guess? Meursault reports he remembered little that day of the
funeral. That night, he happily arrives in Alegeris.
b.
Rising Action – The
next day Marie and Meursault have seen each other and had gone out into the
movies and had dinner. The following day, Raymond invited him to dinner and
talks about how he has beaten up his mistress. Marie and Meursault got engaged
like “whatever” Meursault said. As
they celebrated their engagement, in the beach the grooms bumped into two
Arabs, including one is Raymond’s mistress’ brother.
c.
Climax – The Arab and the mistress husband, Raymond
fought and Raymond even thought of killing him but Meursault stopped him. But,
Meursault himself, killed the Arab, for no apparent reason.
d.
Falling Action –
Meursault was thrown in jail. His lawyer seems to be disgusted at Meursault’s
lack of remorse over his crime and lack of emotions, especially, lack of grief
during his mom’s funeral. The examining magistrate, can’t understand Meursault
actions, and decides to put him and his faith in God. Meursault, of course,
refuses, insisting that he does not believe in God. The examining magistrate
cannot accept his lack of belief and hence; dubs him, “Monsieur Antichrist.”
e.
Resolution –
Meursault got used to prison life and isolation from the unnecessities of life.
He manages to keep his mind occupied, and he sleeps for most of each day. Then,
he was taken to the courthouse for his trial. The subject quickly shifts from
his crime to what he believes, living is nonsense; especially his lack of
emotion during his mom’s funeral. The director and several other people who
attended the vigil and the funeral are called to testify, and they all attest
to Meursault’s lack of grief or tears. Even Marie was called to testify what he
was during their hangout the first time they re-met. During his summation the
following day, the prosecutor calls Meursault a monster and says that his lack
of moral feeling threatens all of society. Meursault is found guilty and is
sentenced to death by beheading.
f.
Conclusion – As
Meursault struggles to come to terms with his situation of he has trouble
accepting the certainty and inevitability of his fate, awaits for his
execution. Meursault even thought of escaping and changing himself, if that the
people wanted. The chaplain visited Meursault, to renounce his atheism and turn
to God, but still Meursault refuses. The chaplain was flabbergasted with his
answer, the same as with the magistrate did. Meursault suddenly got wrathful,
grabs the chaplain, and scolded the chaplain. He declares that he is correct in
believing in a meaningless, purely physical world. For the first time,
Meursault truly embraces the idea that human existence holds no greater
meaning. He abandons all hope for the future and accepts the “gentle
indifference of the world.” This acceptance makes Meursault feel happy.
V.
Vocabulary
Glint
– Because of the glint, I lost my eyesight for a short while.
Subsidize
– I always subsidize my friends to take a single photo of the moment.
Odious
– Meursault is odious towards the Chaplain and Magistrate’s beliefs.
Indignantly
– Meursault, the suspect of the crime, left the jail, indignantly.
Parricide
– That suspect, is the parricide of that crime last month of July.
Moorish
– The Arab, the guy we saw at the beach, is moorish and he even looks like one.
Perturbed
– My brothers perturbed me while doing my book review that’s due tomorrow.
Impartial
– It is impartial enough for me to have these biscuits and let my brothers have
the tasty looking deliciously made cookies made by grandma.
Irksome
– It is really irksome to have no big sister around; whom can I tell my secrets
to?
VI.
Themes
The
importance of living, the sense that we are here, the fact that we are all
going to die eventually, but why some people risk and waste their time in
nonsense things. Meursault’s point of view is really intriguing, especially
towards the people around him, who cares for him, like Marie. The chaplain and
the marginal were frustrated at Meursault when he answered that he will not
renounce what he truly believes in and will not turn in God.
The pain of being strange or alienated is the
minor theme of the novel, as indicated by the total. Meursault knows that he is
ostracized for being different. The neighbors criticize him for his treatment
of his mother, and even Marie says she has fallen in love with him because he
is odd. The knowledge that he is different makes Meursault feel even more
alienated, which renders him unable to forge real human relationships. It is
clear that he suffers from his sense of isolation and lack of emotion.
Meursault separates himself from the society. He
then creates a barrier isolating himself from the others, who cares for him; friends, from his lover, from human emotion, and
eventually from normal logic. This isolation is self-prescribed; the main
character isn’t exiled by any means – he separates himself. Actually in the end
of the novel, Meursault realizes that he has the option and ability to
choose; that he can desire to be alone or to be surrounded by great people and
maybe or he can stay as the way he is. But he
is conscious of his own ability to decide.
Not only Meursault separates himself from the society, but also
towards women. First proof is that wherein he
does not cry at his mother’s funeral. Second, he does not sympathize with
Raymond’s ex-girlfriend when she is brutally beaten. Lastly but sadly, he does
not love his own girlfriend, though he admittedly enjoys her company. Treatment
of women is the main theme here, but other romantic and/or sexual relationships
in the novel provide additional insights by way of contrast.
According to the absurdist, religion is
constructed by man in an attempt to create meaning to a senseless existence.
Acceptance of religion, of the possibility of an afterlife, would mean that man
effectively escapes death. This is a destructive belief, as only the
realization and acceptance of impending death allows man to live to his
fullest. The Stranger would condemn this, and at one point,
the novel’s hero directly accuses a chaplain of "living like a dead
man." Refuting the "no atheists on fox holes" claim, this
character challenges the social construct of religion even before his own
death, refusing to "waste any last minutes on God."
VII.
Evaluation
Albert Camus writes different than other authors because it
seems like he himself is talking to me. When I was reading the novel, I was
hooked from the very beginning because of how interesting the book is. To be
honest, I was very puzzled on what Meursault
want to bring up. His beliefs are very
mischievous, especially, towards the society. The chaplain and the magistrate
even tried their best to change Meursault’s mind and perspective of his life
point of view. I must say, Meursault did
have an attitude, especially, when he grabbed and yelled at the chaplain, that
wasn’t very nice.
But overall, the book was not but is
extravagant. Not explaining but letting
the readers to realize the real meaning of You
Only Live Once (YOLO) statement. We
need to understand that we exist because we are given the chance to change
something in this world. Yes, we only live just for a quite in a while in our
dearly planet, mother Earth. But that doesn’t mean we should waste the
opportunity because little things makes big difference. Even though, some
infinities are bigger than some infinities, we all have that chance to change the
world and make living worthwhile.
Meanwhile, upon Meursault’s point of
view, all I can say is that his beliefs does makes sense but very mischief and
many people may find it unmoral because there really are deep reasons why you are
breathing right now. Is he oblivious to not realize that the real reason he is living
in the first place? Maria Cardona was very loving and faithful onto him, though
and all.
0 comments